Friday, December 19, 2008
Government in Sacramento playing Shell Game at your expense.
The state government in California is about as full of it as the L.A. City government, with a whole different cast of characters. Don’t worry if you don’t know them, they really don’t care about that just as long as they (a.) continue to be re-elected, (b.) are able to collect more money from people and businesses in California so that they can cover their bad money management decisions, and, (c.) continue to get paid all the benefits that they can from their elected post.
The other thing about the politicians at all levels you can note again is that they like to handle money in large sums, the larger the better. It looks to me to be an ego thing or some sort of an establishment of a pecking order among politicians- a kind of game: “Who can squeeze the most money out of what you already have” It also makes for increasing the opportunities to waste more money and victimize taxpayers at a higher rate.
Yesterday’s plan was another adventure by the Democratic majority into victimization of taxpayers along the way to the reaching a budget. The L.A. TIMES accurately labels their story , “California Democrats devise plan to hike taxes,” http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-budget18-2008dec18,0,1785472.story The story gives the details and background, as well as views on the moves involved in achieving the plan, and what you can expect to happen now.
And here's a reminder of the size of the pot of money they affect. When they speak of a "billion dollars" that means "a million one-thousand dollar bills."
Or you could look at it like this: Put a THOUSAND millionaires into an arena and that would equal the wealth of ONE billionaire.
The plan that Governor Arnold already said he will veto, was to increase taxes, most of which they called “Fees,” which was done by majority vote by lawmakers instead of two-thirds vote that the State Constitution requires in matters of taxation. The proposed changes were as follows: INCREASE State Sales tax by 3/4%, ADD a “fee” to the 2009 State Income Tax bill for everyone, INCREASE gasoline tax by 13 cents each gallon.
The problem with getting more money was that the taxing power is limited. So what do they do to get around that limitation? Simple. “Let’s call the increased charges ‘FEES’ and you only need to have a simple majority, not a two-thirds vote.” The word they should have used was “disingenuous” because you can call an elephant a cow all day long, but you still won’t be getting any steaks or hamburgers to barbecue from that mislabeling.
Fees, in general, mean some service is done and there is a related price for it, like a "copy fee" for documents or "entrance fee" for city or county beach parking lots. You get the idea. The point here is that you are paying for a service and there is a set price to cover the value of it, so it's an actual FEE.
Now taxes just happen to be unrelated to the benefit you receive and more related to how much money your governing politicians need to pay the bills they were supposed to be managing. The amount is set most commonly in terms of a percent of something, like your income, your gasoline purchase or other unit of measure. Usually, when there is an increased FEE charged, there has been some increase in the real cost of the service.
If you see a cost to you that is going up and the amount of that increase is set by a vote of politicians without any real relation to the COST of doing the service itself, and it's a percentage rate, then you can be fairy certain it is really a TAX.
Well, the Governor’s veto, as the story includes, is not due to the legal terms “shell game” of the legislature, but by the fact that Arnold did not get all he wanted into the bill, including an ability to lay off more state workers which bothers employees unions quite a bit.
Read the story for more of their manueverings. And that’s just at the State level. More misdeeds are happening at the city level- but they are on their break until January when they come back and make the mess worse as they so typically do.
Thursday, December 18, 2008
Some Christmas Cheer in a Card
But if you did get Congressperson Sanchez' seasonal greeting card (the kind that used to be called a "Christmas" card), you'll notice that she leans heavily on the gender aspect in the image that includes her cat and a motorcycle that I don't believe is hers. Some people may think it's suggestive, and thus, inappropriate, but really, it's suggestive of what? "Vote for me" would be the suggestion I think the Congressperson intended. But the card is nice and her greeting card from a year or two past was along the lines of this one, maybe getting more noticed.
You have to give her credit as not many in Congress could do quite the same card with any favorable effect. Do not confuse Loretta with her sister, Linda Sanchez, also a Congressperson.Linda is expecting a baby in a few months and is single as of this date. I don't know if she's got a card out, too, but I'm not looking for it. Linda is, well, not the best role model for young people at all in that regard, but that's another story.
To end this observation of public servants and their communications with constituents, I just want to say I don't think the same card layout would look nearly as well had it come from my CM Jose Huizar, or CD-1's Ed Reyes. Bah, humbug to them both.
To Loretta's credit, there is small disclaimer on the back that tells us that the card was not done at taxpayer expense but, instead, paid for by a supportive fund of some sort. A truly nice card.
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Alumni's honored Comedian and Actor Rudy Moreno on the tube tonight
Rudy's on-screen characters have been pretty quirky fellows in the past, if you recall NBC's "Kingpin" miniseries about a wealthy Latino druglord and the operations in the U.S. and Mexico. Rudy continued with some other character individuality in an episode of "The Shield," starring the Emmy and Golden Globe award-winning Michael Chiklis. Rudy played a school board member arrested in a sting while carrying a bag full of toys, the adult kind, but evaded being charged with any crime as a political favor.
Tune in to see if what kind of character he becomes tonight.
Elections all done? Still a chance in March to change the City.
The Presidential election is over but the city elections are almost here. Locally, voters in Lincoln Heights will be deciding on who will represent it in Council District 1 ("CD-1"). Ed Reyes has been the Council Member ("CM") since winning the CD-1 seat on the Council in 2001, just barely avoiding a runoff election. The current term would have been the last term for Reyes, except that the City-created "Measure R" passed in November 2006 added a third term. That part of "Measure R" was played down so as not to draw attention away from the "ethics reform" half of the combined ballot measure, one prime example of the self-serving nature of CMs when fairness takes a back seat to personal interest.
Grab a copy today of the free L.A. WEEKLY at libraries, stores, restaurants and news stands before the new edition comes out tomorrow so you can see their big story on how public access t.v. has been cut out so that you will no longer have community access channels to see what the local politicians are up to as Channel 35 presents on cable t.v. now.
The L.A. WEEKLY gives loads of details to show how "special interests" can get lawmakers to change laws if they get to the right people to take their side. Fabian Nunez, ex-Assembly Speaker, was a prime mover on the state's change in the law. Could he have been motivated by the heavy campaign funds headed his way, as well as his favored charity getting sizeable donations from the telephone industry, including AT&T?
The CMs in LA really did nothing to resist cutting this out and voted approval. That means that there will be no more cable access channel, beginning next month. [The online version of the L.A. WEEKLY is still available at http://www.laweekly.com/ , but the hard copy versions can be carried around to read without having to be near a computer.]
And if you still believe that L.A. City politicians really care about the common people of the city, see "L.A. Slams Residents With Stiff Fees and Taxes" by David Heimpel in the same L.A. WEEKLY edition, also available onlline at http://www.laweekly.com/2008-12-11/news/l-a-slams-residents-with-stiff-fees-and-taxes/ . The continuing mismangement of the city by the council under Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa's so-called and ego-driven leadership means that when more money is needed they come to the regular people to carry the burden.
Ed Reyes, along with most of the other CM's, has continued to support these measures, being a strong supporter of Villaraigosa, even if that means that his constituents suffer as a result. Any examples to show you? Yes, and one big one is described in the "L.A. Slams Residents..." article, with a little sample shown here:
This is an eye-opening article for those of you who just quietly assumed that city lawmakers had your best interests at heart and that things were all fine and well at City Hall. Well, that's not the way it is. If you do not do anything about politicians taking advantage of their power, they will continue to pick your wallet and leave you worse off, while they empower their own circle of friends with lucrative contracts and appointments to positions. These actions are there for you to see if you examine beyond what they present to you.In May 2006, the City Council announced a trash-collection fee that
Villaraigosa sold to residents by publicly promising it would go to hiring 1,000
new cops. In concert with that, the City Council has boosted the trash fee 330
percent, from $11 to $36.32.The fee hike goes far beyond the actual cost of collecting and dumping trash. By this fall, it had generated a $137 million mountain of cash. But Villaraigosa’s vow that the excess funds would go to hiring cops proved untrue. An audit by city Controller Laura Chick has shown that Villaraigosa and Police Chief William Bratton spent only $47.2 million hiring new officers. Much of the rest went to raises and perks for the powerful police union.
Ed Reyes as the CD-1 incumbent in the March election has the advantage in money for advertising and other campaign tools over his opponent, Jesus Rosas, the only challenger for Reyes to face. Despite the disparity in the power base shown in this Council race, you should really give serious thought for change, if only for the sake of change. A good showing at the polls will let politicians know that the voters' support is not to be taken for granted.
As another example of representation of the people and not the existing political machines of the incumbents, Mayor Villaraigosa is facing a long list of challengers for his second term. The most interesting challenger on that list is Zuma Dogg, a city activist, beginning over two years ago in that role with a dispute for his own matter with the city and learning the ropes of what goes on in city hall since then, much to the chagrin of the Council.
Zuma Dogg has probably attended more meetings than many of the Council Members over the last six months where he did not miss a single meeting. The CMs do not like that they have to explain anything to anyone, but he finds and reveals a lot of the problems that make the city worse, AND it's not just negativity. Among the discussions during limited "public comment" time that the Council provides, Zuma Dogg gives some pointed and highly spirited presentations that the CMs try to ignore, often only to find out that what he says IS true.
Ed Reyes' representation of CD-1 should be examined, as well as his ties to the policies and instructions he received from Mayor Antonio. As a certainty, the Mayor needs to be ousted for the benefit of the city- Villaraigosa is the "All-AboutMe 11-% Mayor" who cares about his own publicity first, over the city's well-being, over his duties, and even over family. (See the September L.A. WEEKLY article that reveals "Hours of travel, fund-raising and PR leave little time for his job. ... " http://www.laweekly.com/2008-09-11/news/the-all-about-me-mayor/ )
Any vote for Reyes should be carefully considered- unless you work for him and then you just want to keep your well-paid job and might even make anonymous blog comments against the challengers to keep your guy in office. For the rest of use, some dedication to the constituents and not to the paycheck would be nice to see. Reyes, makes the standard council salary of OVER $186,000.00 a year, an amount that is the highest in the entire United States, and there's MORE benefits, too, you know. That's comes to a tidy sum of $15, 500 a MONTH, a salary figure that's really WAY, too high for elected "public servants." But just try to get them to take a pay cut and these "servants" just about revolt.
There should not be automatic votes for whoever is in office, raising your bills, wasting your money, and expecting you to be grateful for any attention you get from them. THEY should be thanking YOU for the support that put them into office, and, that support can and should be REMOVED when they fail to represent you. More later.
Tuesday, December 16, 2008
Last week this year for LHS classes; Short day today
Today is the last Professional Development Day for 2008- Parents: Your child will be out much sooner today.
The Lincoln Heights Christmas Parade on Sunday gave the school groups a place for them to perform for a wider group of people than before, and they made the most of it. While I did not see any programs available to actually pin down which entry was which, most had signs or banners.
The event was very well attended and the parade, if anything, was a little on the long side. The announcer for the parade was not Mr. Shapiro, and, again, that difference could be from old news; it might have been an old "cut-and-paste" promotion from another edition of the parade that was recycled too fast for accuracy. I am just guessing.
The announcer kept the crowd entertained, which is something useful, and this is where I found out that there was going to be "live snow" at the assembly area behind the BofA after the parade. I didn't look for that myself, since live snow should not be kept in captivity from my point of view. It's just to cruel for something that belongs in the wild.
Well, a tough week for students to stay focused on studying, but Friday will be here before you know it.
Monday, December 15, 2008
A few photos of LHS entries in Sunday's Christmas Parade
Saturday, December 13, 2008
Weekend events- a review of totally free Christmas season entertainment.
There are a few items to mention that are happening this weekend, and totally free, with the local one being the Lincoln Heights Christmas Parade. That will be starting out at 11 a.m. from the formation area at the DMV office on Lincoln Park Avenue, getting on down the rest of Broadway as fast or slow as it goes.
I am not sure if this is a rain-or-shine parade, and suggest bringing an umbrella or poncho (the rain repellant kind, not the amigo kind) and that should make you prepared for whatever comes. As one who has been to the Pasadena Rose Parade where it rained through the whole parade, these things can help out a lot, especially for picture-taking. The participants that year turned out to be a hearty and determined bunch, and completed the 2-1/2 mile route, with most in high spirits, but very wet.
Also FREE on Sunday, a Tuba Christmas Concert at the Alex Theater on Brand Avenue in Glendale, 7 p.m., will be performed by a huge collection of tuba players coming together. It looks like the Tuba Christmas Concerts aren't a new thing, but the sure are not common since you have to gather a lot of tube players together, and Christmas is a good time to do it. Check the website for many more details on this whole thing, especially if you are a tuba player and want to get in on it or read about these things.
Another Christmas Concert program will be TONIGHT, Saturday at 7 p.m. in Eagle Rock, at St. Domenic Church. The Annual Christmas Music Concert, with all of the various church's choirs performing, will begin at 7 p.m.. It’s held in the church that is located on Merton St., across the street from the Eagle Rock Public Library and on the next block from Eagle Rock Elementary School. I mention this because yours truly has a role as guitar player with the Contemporary Choir’s segment of the program. That role seems to diminish each year, mostly in terms of sound reinforcement available to channel my part, relatively minor, but still, I will be there in my supportive capacity. It’s a seasonal break from the routines of the week and usually comes out very well, as I have seen it to be very audience-pleasing over the last 20 years.
Here a some photos of some of the Rose Parade entries who came from far and near to get a taste of some rare California rain.
These flag girls were very enthusiastic at the beginning.
The entrants kept up their spirits like these girls from Japan.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Some cultural aspects of ethnicities revealed
and if that wasn't enough, more on culture as observed.
O.K., that's enough culture to consider at one time.
_____________________________________________________
There is one further departure from any real learning that I can give you, taken from the latest newsletter, Tech Bytes, by Steve Bass, a computer savvy writer who shares his knowledge in his website Newsletter Subscription Resources:
****************************************************************
Warning: The following is another in the category of "absolute time wasters" that you may want to put off trying for another time.
Parachute Jump is a time wasting game that will test your skills in balance and physics. First click "Jump", then "Chute", ...... then holler "Duck" (Hint: watch the flag for wind direction and speed- just so you won't waste TOO much time.)
=================================================================
Council District 1 elections coming March 3rd. Consider.
CD-1 Council Member ("CM"), Ed Reyes, is running for a 3rd term with only one opponent, Jesus Rosas, having qualified to be on the ballot so he's certainly pleased. The lack of any challenge to what City Hall routinely does is disheartening. Occasionally, the ire of the community is raised as with the aborted "Las Villas" project that would have put a restaurant and banquet facility on the site that was occupied by the Rose Eye Clinic. The biggest objection was made based on the intention to have alcohol served in the restaurant. Many opponents likened this condition to having a liquor store added to the neighborhood and scenarios of doom and disaster for residents and students were some of the extreme levels to which the discussion was taken.
The site is now a dirt lot across the street from the LHS on Thomas St. and North Broadway. CM Reyes resisted for a while, considering an addition to the business element of Lincoln Heights would be economically beneficial. Finally, the continued protests forced Reyes to reconsider the whole thing, and he relented in his support and the project ended. This was about as close as Reyes has come to being challenged while in office.
City elections largely demonstrate an historic apathy, with often only 1/4 or less of the registered voters participating in the city elections. The city council ran through two deceptive measures that pulled in the desired result in 2007. One total lie was the "term limits" proposition that really was a"term extension" ploy, connected with the "ethics reform." The Council supported this wholeheartedly- who do you think put it together? The result was to fool the voters to think that "ethics in government" were being somehow monitored and enforced. The reality was that the second of the two-fold purpose of this measure had the purpose of changing the term limits from two-term to add one more, for a total maximum of THREE-terms. That was played DOWN to a whisper level, lest anyone understand the true reason for creating the ballot measure.
The ethics part of the measure was another irony. What ethics are demonstrated by a council that intentionally misleads the voters? The called for in the ethics part of the measure had little useful effect, just a little re-shuffling of the deck chairs on the Titanic. But it did serve the purpose of camouflaging the term extension as it was designed to do.
Our city council, including the CD-1 representative, Ed Reyes, pushed another measure that was called a "10 % tax reduction of the phone tax." That was another completely dishonest move in intent, although not in math.
The City had a 10 percent tax on all phone service in the city. There was a court challenge to the City's tax because the federal enabling regulations relied upon for collecting this tax had recently ceased, but the City kept it's tax collection running. The court case was pending a decision that was very clearly heading to a decision that would declare the tax illegal and bar the City from collecting the 10 percent tax or any tax.
The "deal" that lured voters was a "reduction of 10 percent" of the phone tax. It would change from a "10% tax" to a "9% tax" and that IS "ten-percent." Sounds good? What's the catch? If the voters had simply all stayed home, or voted "NO" to the measure, the anticipated court decision would have invalidated the tax completely- you would have a "Zero" tax, reducing it "100%"; and the end of that tax altogether.
The Council saw this outcome clearly and quickly moved to create the measure to ENACT a tax by "voter approval." Such "voter" approval WOULD legally be the authorization needed to take the place of the federal provisions that were ended and no longer available to support the continuing 10-percent city tax. A "NO" on this measure would have meant what? It changes it all. The existing tax would have been ruled invalid and the City would be missing that money- and all politicians live to handle and disperse money, the more the better. We can examine to whom it goes at another time.
Now that the tax measure was voted on and approved, there is a NEW city tax put into place that collects 9% instead of 0%, NOT a good deal. Oh, and they didn't make the other parts of this very clear, but the measure not only created the 9% tax for phone service, it extended the City's authority to tax other aspects of phone usage including Internet activities. Proponents say that won't happen but they could not give a good reason for putting it there. If they did not intend to have it ready to be used and create more tax opportunities for the City, then why put it there?
All this is the City government that Reyes is part and parcel of and it's too bad that there is only one challenger to run for that office to represent CD-1, or any CD in an ethical manner. Both measures were supported by all CMs as you will find no comments by them as I have presented to show the "OTHER SIDE" that they did not want to reveal. That is not honesty, but whatever you want to call it, that IS what we have now.
One more week of classes for Lincoln High in 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Christmas is coming. What to give Lincoln Heights? Try a parade.
In case you did not receive the email and want to be part of this entry, what you should know is that alumni parade participants are asked to show up at the formation area at the DMV offices at Lincoln Park Avenue and Mission by 10 a.m. They will follow the cheer leaders and the school band. Participating alumni are asked to wear school colors and comfortable shoes. You can get any further information on that entry directly by contacting the Alumni Association through it's website.
The Lincoln Heights Neighborhood Council's own announcement provides some additional details on the parade. From that web posting:
"At the end, there will be a celebration for the whole community in the
parking lot behind the Bank of America with Santa, snow, Christmas gifts, music
and food for all. Thousands of spectators are expected to crowd along the Parade
route. For over two hours they will be treated to a seemingly endless line of
colorful drill teams, dance groups, bands, classic cars, dignitaries and large
and small floats. The Miss Taiwan entry will grace an antique fire truck from
Fire Station #1."
The Christmas Parade announcer will be LHS teacher, Mark Shapiro, as noted in an earlier posting on this blog. He will be delivering the play-by-play on the parade from Griffin Avenue and North Broadway, making the adjustment from his regular duty as Lincoln High School's Football home games announcer. Now you have the location and you know his work, so get there early to find a spot to hear the Shapiro touch, a truly unique experience.
I am glad to see that the "Christmas Parade" is still called that and not a "Holiday Parade"which sounds so cheesy and yielding to political correctness. If there is a federal and a state holiday for Christmas, there should not be any hand-wringing over the title of a parade that comes once a year with most entries themed with Christmas decorations and Santa Claus as the big ending. Ho, Ho, Ho.Wednesday, December 10, 2008
LAUSD makes it official- Brewer's Bought Out and Off
Well, there goes another page into the LAUSD scrapbook of economic fiascos and waste and abuse. This story continues with the saga of the LAUSD's search for salvation and relates to my comments from yesterday's posting here. "$517,500-plus buyout OKd for L.A. schools chief David Brewer," LA TIMES, 12-10-08 http://www.latimes.com/news/education/la-me-laschools-brewer10-2008dec10,0,3316108,full.story
Another not-to-shrewd maneuver to cut the losses will make David Brewer an "Ex-superintendent" come January 31, 2009. And at the bargain price of only $517,500.00. That exit strategy was almost as notable as rivaling their sign-up of the Admiral as being a deal at $300,000.00 a year for a 4-year contract- and he doesn't even throw a decent fastball or have many RBIs for that price.
Brewer, however, did show that he could pitch some elusive curveballs during the job and even on the way out, not bad for being 62. Brewer is going out with a good boost as far as his slugging percentage goes, hitting the District hard on their final pitches and getting his own homerun, to continue with the baseball metaphors, shown very expensively in the L.A. TIMES story today:
Because the board terminated Brewer "without cause," he's entitled to
receive a buyout specified under his contract. The terms under the contract
are 18 months' salary, totaling $450,000, and his expense account over that
period, which adds $67,500. He'll also get cash for unused vacation pay, an
amount not yet calculated. Finally, he'll be eligible for health benefits
during the period covered by the buyout.
Since Brewer was given a job without any real standards to be met, what did the Board think they were going to do if "he didn't do his job satisfactorily?" Really poor vision for LAUSD - again. This is the organization that has the responsibility to work with students and standards for their performance but can't manage when it comes to their own operations.
If they had created a contract in the beginning with some measurable or objective items as even the lowliest of employees see in their own job descriptions, they might have been able to find sufficient "cause" to save the taxpayers a few dollars. But, not surprisingly, the LAUSD administration heads don't show that they care. They don't have any experience, successful experience, that is, in getting the District moving ahead. What they have in plentiful amounts is just a lot of experience in the waste of money and the abuse of the public trust.
The LA TIMES story includes comments from Kevin Reed, the District's head attorney when Brewer was hired. Reed tries to explain the difficulties involved with this mess, but the lack of foresight and planning as well as considerations of the realities of the problem they started out with should have called for more time at the hiring stage if they knew it was a difficulty. And if it was too big a risk, why take it? And why take that risk of getting an astronomically high-salaried person on-board with no experience in the task? But the LAUSD attorneys are holding the bag for that contract drafting part of the story, and now are covering their own asses. Read on in that LA TIMES story for other views.
If the problem was so difficult, what justified the Board in taking the financial risk that THIS outcome might happen? Simple. They don't HAVE to be accountable, their pay isn't affected, and life goes on for them. In terms of behavior that we often use in educating people, young and old, "There are no consequences for their actions."
How badly does LAUSD handle the operations of the District to generate an education for the "K through 12" population? I'll compare it to lending out your car to a relative for a while to get to work. You know, a simple favor. Then you get the car back and notice a few things about it like needing a wash. O.K. no big deal. Then you find a lot of dents and other body damage, noticing too, that the gas gauge is on "empty"and the engine doesn't sound right.
The example continues. On top of this, the cops come to check out a hit and run involving your car and, later, your mail brings you a lot of accumulated unpaid parking ticket notices to light up your life. So when you're at the police station you start to think about doing things differently. The LAUSD has been there and does the same over and over. What can you really expect when they have no controls? Are they just "hard core" or what?
Monica Garcia, the President of the Board, tried to salvage the situation, publicity-wise, for another day with her comments, taken below from the LA TIMES story:
In a brief appearance before reporters, Garcia took no questions and read from a
statement that echoed the concerns of Cortines. She vowed to develop a
"leadership plan," adding, "We understand that we need stability."
Well, all that is certainly reassuring, Monica. A word to the wise- Stay in school and you, too, will be able to make very insightful comments like these when the need arises. But shouldn't they have known about all of this BEFORE NOW? Oh, well. Here's another word to the wise- Better late than never.
David Brewer's comments on the state of things are just as transparent, simply being useless blather:
In a brief statement regarding the buyout, Brewer said: "No matter what
happens next, I will remain a champion for the children, teachers and staff of LAUSD."* * *
Brewer said he recognized that the controversy over his removal had the potential to exacerbate racial tensions in the city. His departure, he added, should not be viewed through a racial prism, although he accused his opponents of pursuing political agendas to the detriment of children.
I really don't see that Brewer is sitting on any powder keg of racial tension based on what happens here to him. Brewer was pretty much an unknown to the average person in the city. If anything, it's the revelation of the details of his pay and benefits, along with the terms of his "buyout" that would inflame public opinion in this area. But he's just a player in the game that the Board runs on a daily basis, and unlike the conditions in Las Vegas, the odds are not with the house.
Monday, December 08, 2008
Will Supt. Brewer be leaving LAUSD (poorer)?
LAUSD Superintendent David Brewer has been on the job for 2 years, and was hired for a contract price of $300,000.00 per year for 4 years. There are lots of people who want him out now. What is all that about?
The Board of Education is more than anything else another political operation. They are now trying to get Mr. Brewer out for a very good reason. There has been no change seen to benefit the students, or the District. There’s nothing of an improvement in exchange for paying him to do the job. And that is a pretty hefty sum he’s getting. There is a $45,000.00 annual expense account to cover his needs, including meals, and a $3,000 a month housing allowance to go with the $300 grand a year salary. Brewer’s expense account alone is about equal to what an entry-level teacher’s annual income is.
That outcome should have been expected from the start and for the stubborn supporters of Brewer, after a year of no change, no real plan and no hope.
The LAUSD did two things that it does best, (1.) Nothing, and, (2.) Spend money for non-productive activity, also called “wasting money.”
Now, Mr. Brewer has focused on two items himself, (1.) his accomplishments as the Superintendent, which appear to be largely imaginary, and (2.) his willingness to step down from his position as the Board wants- as long as he gets his money.
You may think he’s being greedy and selfish, but his reaction is just normal behavior for politicians and he shares that quality with so many more appointed and elected officials in city, county and state government, and let’s not leave out the federal level. You have to consider that the LAUSD went out and selected Mr. Brewer for the job and worked out the deal to hire him. Why they chose him, a retired U.S. Navy admiral with no demonstrable experience in the education system to come in at a time of intense distress in the District is one question. Well, having no educational experience should have been a clue of what to expect. There was not even a real plan on what was supposed to happen, but David Brewer still says he accomplished a lot.
Ramon C. Cortines was appointed as Asst. Superintendent last Spring to help fix the LAUSD’s condition. If progress what actually happening, they would not have needed Cortines, who has to be paid well for his time, too. Mr. Cortines has much more experience so he is the one that is doing what Brewer should have been doing all along. At the tune of $300,000.00 a year, you have a lot of money going down the drain at the same time that LAUSD continues to ask for more money to operate the District. It is a District of declining enrolment and substantial construction in the face of that fact, a very contradictory situation.
Mr. Brewer was the focus of a Sunday, December 7, 2008 L.A. TIMES column by Steve Lopez (see posting of Saturday's items on this blog) that demonstrates problems with the hiring of Mr. Brewer and shows how the LAUSD Board has racked up another expensive misstep in management, all at the taxpayers expense. Nothing comes from the wallets of the politicians; nothing is taken out of the pay of any of them for any mistakes they make, no matter how big or how obvious they were. Maybe that is why this pattern of the Board should not be expected to change in the near or even distant future.
In the L.A. TIMES story today, December 9, 2008, “L.A. schools chief says he'll take buyout,” http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lausd9-2008dec09,0,3527514,full.story Brewer defended his performance.
“Brewer said last week he didn't understand the board's unhappiness with his
performance. He also defended his record, noting that test scores rose this year
and that voters last month passed the district's largest-ever school bond."
‘I would take those two years and match them up against anyone else in
the country,’ he had said.”
Very simply, the response should be that speaking it doesn't make it true, and any test score improvement is a change that happens unevenly throughout the District, on a school by school basis. Brewer, like any politician takes credit for anything positive that they can find whether they caused it or not. And like a true politician, Brewer will deny responsibility for the bad things that happen on his watch.
The fact that the voters approved the bond measure last month for $7 billion has really little to do with the performance of David Brewer. Did anyone pay attention to what he said when they cast their vote? Did most people even know who he is? How can he claim that dubious credit. It had more to do with the District’s campaign salesmanship that was applied right before the elections. The Board launched the deeper journey into indebtedness for taxpayers that will last them for generations to come.
Why $7 billion anyway? Because they CAN “ask” for any amount and they DID, doubling the original plan to ask for a $3.5 billion bond to cover non-specific expenses, really just money to have to spare. Bonds are not free- maybe some thought so, but they are actually expensive. The taxpayers have to pay for the loan of the money and can cost taxpayers roughly double the face value over the life of the bonds.
In fact, the LAUSD will probably also waste a good deal of this amount per their track record. Remember the new Belmont high school, over $400 million for a high school that is the most expensive one in the country, and possibly, in the world, built over an oil field and earthquake fault? Don’t forget the “Arts” high school on Grand and Cesar Chavez (formerly Sunset Blvd.) old headquarters that was delayed in completion by a year and way higher in costs than the plan, all for the benefit of a design “image” for the city in the future, not for the students or our crisis-level performance..
Some actual performance “results” in the present time would have been nice, but they don’t see that over on Beaudry, the District’s headquarters. So you have another year of students passing through the system and the school was not ready to serve any of them. It is so typical. Every year of delay on any program or other change will mean another year of 12th graders moving on without being a part of whatever good it was supposed to create. Students do not stop to wait for the improvement; and then some just dropout.
But the Belmont project was the work of an earlier Board that escaped without any blame or personal responsibility for any mismanagement (which is normal for political bodies- and also explains why they don’t really worry about making mistakes). Most people are not familiar with the glitches, expensive glitches in money and time, that happened with the “Arts” high school- another Steve Lopez column earlier in 2008 reflects on that and is available through the L.A. TIMES online.
What happened during 2007 and 2008, with the payroll system catastrophe that cost over $100 million? Read Nov. 22, 2008, Daily Breeze, “LAUSD’s Payroll Mess” and judge for yourself. http://www.dailybreeze.com/ci_11091571
Mr. Brewer will be able to walk away with a lot of money no matter what, and that’s a pretty good deal since most firings for not doing what the boss wants doesn’t usually leave you with money for NOT working. So it looks like it will cost LAUSD $500,000.00 for Mr. Brewer to pack up and leave his job. Mr. Cortines looks like the one left to really do the work needed for school improvement, and Mr. Brewer’s expense accounts and housing allowance did not do anything useful for taxpayers.
One more thing, in his bid to appear to be the good guy, Brewer has cleverly shifted the talk to racial terms, and while he says he does not want things to be divisive in racial terms, HE is the one bringing that sort of characterization to the table. If he were not black but instead, every color of the rainbow, he still did not do the job that was needed to be done. I think that he relies on the tensions in LAUSD regarding racial concerns INSIDE the schools to come out ahead. Some beleaguered schools have now come to be run as charter schools, using specificly tailored approaches for the needs of the campus to solve problems. Uniforms routinely are part of the charter school differences and I think THAT change should be used in all LAUSD as a start to get some headway in straightening out things for school operations.
No, Brewer, because he is African-American, considers racial issues to be used as a shield from accountability for his game plan. It’s all a shell game and LAUSD is a player, the losing one again, to let it happen. Did they put a contract together for his employment that guaranteed him money for NOT working out? Did they add any terms to release him less expensively if they could not find progress while the District was under his responsibility? Well, if they did plan it, somebody goofed badly, again.
Some on the Board want to keep Brewer for the last 2 years of his contract- why? He’s not working out and he doesn’t appear to know how to change. The Board is to blame, too, for not getting a work plan for him to follow in order to measure up his progress against what they wanted to see, step by step, in regular intervals of time. Like I said, LAUSD has a track record, a very expensive track record.
This is another indication of a District too large to work effectively or economically. We don’t have students being educated, and we don’t have fiscal responsibility for the money that is spent to ensure it is spent wisely and not wasted. See Saturday’s story here on the LAUSD credit card waste.
If you wonder why things don’t get better, you can check out the people at the top, and not just the schools that your children and neighbor’s children attend. Board President Monica Garcia is openly aligned with Mayor Villaraigosa, who also added low-performing school to his duties, while still not attending to real city business.
Monica Garcia’s association with the Mayor is expected since she would not have won her seat without the Villaraigosa-approval.
Villaraigosa does not have a background of educational expertise, he just has a lot of money coming in from special interests to finance campaigns that function to hide lots of the revealing truth and color the lies to make them appear to be the truth. It all ends up helping everyone but the city, the schools and the students.
The Sunday Parade in Highland Park- 2008-style.
Instead, they had a "Northeast Los Angeles Holiday Parade," and that certainly appeared in a lot of places on the web, as I checked it under that name after the parade. I'll get back to that later, but there were lots of entrants, many organizations and many students and schools represented.
Our own Lincoln High School was represented nicely, even if we did not have a band to include in the mix.
(If you see two frames of the same image, don't worry- they are the same; don't ask me why there's two, but one will work for video.)
Sunday, December 07, 2008
December 7, 1941 "A Day That Will Live In Infamy"
The Japanese aircraft carriers were prepared to launch a third attack flight but did not want to spend more hours in the area and risk a loss of any of them should the U.S. ships at sea already know the location of the Japanese ships. Forturnately, none of the U.S. aircraft carriers were in the harbor that morning. The Japanese thought their attack would cripple the U.S. fighting ability to enable them to win the war but they could not get to the carriers and that was a crucial failing of their attack.
The U.S. President, Franklin D. Roosevelt, addressed Congress on Monday, December 8, 1941, and proclaimed December 7th, 1941 as "a day that will live in infamy." War was declared on Japan and a few days later, Germany declared war on the U.S. and World War II had begun for the U.S., lasting until 1945 when the U.S. and it's allies won over the Axis powers, Japan and Germany. Italy was earlier defeated, and it's leader, Benito Mussolini, killed by the Italian citizens.
This was the easily the most treacherous attack upon the U.S. in the 20th Century, being rivaled by the 9-11-01 Attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that claimed nearly 3,000 lives.
RESOURCE ITEMS
FDR's SPEECH TO CONGRESS, 12-8-41:
There is a YouTube video of Franklin D. Roosevelt's address to Congress that conveys the gravity of the situation somewhat and marks the official entry of the U.S. into war. There are several video clips of the speech, but this particular choice is a more complete version with a photo collage and some very clear audio that preserves this historical moment, giving you another example of FDR's leadership role as President. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9uCGxk-v-Mc
THE ATTACK
The Pearl Harbor Attack is presented in the form of graphics, audio and timelines in a series of very informative presentations by NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC at http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/pearlharbor/ The locations and times are some points that are more readily understood in seeing them here.
It is a day for remembrance and, like so many other important moment is the history of the United States is not just forgotten by many, it is not even learned by many in the context of the nation's position in the world at that troubled time, with Germany's persecution and extermination of Jews and others under Hitler's rule, and the British struggle to resist attacks on their soil by the German Luftwaffe's pilots.
Many of the survivors of WW II have now died, and this is what Tom Brokaw has called "The Greatest Generation." It was said a few years back that WW II vets were dying at the rate of 1,000 a day, from the over 1 million that helped win the war. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,357941,00.html Fox news, 5-24-08
If you know of any WW II veterans, or even people who lived through that time in history, you might see if they will talk about their war experience to record that as a verbal history. Once gone, these memories are lost forever unless recorded. The entire country worked for the U.S. victory that brought all races and ethnicities into the picture. In the U.S. we had rationing and extensive recycling to manage our effort. It was a time of universal involvement and sacrifice to allow us to reach the end of the war.
Latinos were involved in this part of history, too, at home and in combat. Their contribution could and should be explored by the rest of us with just a little attention to talking to them as, in many cases, they are are our own relatives- parents, grandparents, great grandparents, uncles and aunts, and so on. Some have experienced unbelievably horrible things, as hapens in all wars, and do not want to remember some events, but others may and will tell us so that the experiences will be remembered by the rest of us from a more personal aspect.
The month of December 1941 was not a typical time of holidays and celebration but the U.S. survived with a more unified spirit than ever before and for a time after WW II, things were peaceful.
Saturday, December 06, 2008
Job Openings: "Magnet School Principal" and "Superintendent" (soon)
One news story in today's LA TIMES shows that a magnet school principal used the school credit card for personal use to the tune of over $150,000.00. He was in court Friday and entered a guilty plea on the charge of misappropriation of public funds, and ordered to pay restitution of $178,00.00 to the LAUSD. And he is just ONE who got caught because of the size of loss. Misappropriation of funds by credit card usage is a very significant area of waste and fraud in LAUSD.
Philip Toyotome of Arcadia was a principal at 32nd Street/USC Performing Arts Magnet, a school near USC, according to the story. He has resigned and since been replaced. You can see the story at http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-principal6-2008dec06,0,3524019.story
Another report on the use of school district credit cards is mentioned in the story, and that showed there was up to $1.8 million dollars misspent each year with the cards ($1,800,000.00).
A second story today tells us that the LAUSD Board wants Supt. Brewer to step down. http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lausd06-2008dec06,0,6988074.story The Board may just buyout the contract of Brewer. His contract is for $300,000.00 per year. LAUSD is so generous with money paid out but they have this tendency to pay out before they even know whether there's a reason to justify it. The payroll software that fouled up paychecks of employees for a year was one example, put into use when it was not really out of a beta-level of operation.
David Brewer might be a nice guy, but he's more and more looking like another LAUSD waste of money. Here's a column from Steve Lopez in the LA TIMES for tomorrow's column http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lopez7-2008dec07,0,877150.column If you want to see how the other half lives, check it out. This is the kind of behavior that we see too frequently in politicians and Brewer turns out to be no diferent. Expensive? Ouch.
Sandy Banks, another LA TIMES columnist has something to add about how Brewer is really not showing what your Superintendent should be about when it comes to the students. http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-banks6-2008dec06,0,5614117.column
This is all the information that I have and if it is accurate, it is a major disappointment for a couple of reasons.
- That condition leaves us with no band. I saw Franklin High's band at the Veteran's Day parade and it shows a lot in terms of school pride being demonstrated when they perform, as with any school's band. We don't get that element operating at Lincoln that itself could promote a better level of morale and pride like the school had in those days we might still remember. Pride in a school should be something contagious, but that means it has to start somewhere to enable it to spread. The area of music should be where it could start. Music has the property of being something that touches everyone in many ways.
- The fact that a "C" level is just barely "average" and that it can't be met is indicative of the academic problems at Lincoln, not just in terms of student performance lagging, but in the overall attitude of students that the need to "work as well as they can" in school is something the students don't seem to adopt as a necessity for success in school life.
I hope to be able to report here soon that there is a change happening.
December, And there's the Highland Park Parade
This parade is much older than the Lincoln Heights parade (happening next week, Sunday at 11 a.m.) and so it has more variety and numbers of entries. I don't know what high schools have as entries but where there are parades, there are bands, drill teams, civic groups, clubs, horses, beauty pageant winners and so on.
Your access is very good from numerous driving directions- AND the Gold Line rail service that runs between Union Station and Pasadena, passes a block behind and along Figueroa St. with a "Highland Park" stop that gets you right there in the main part of the business district.
The weather looks to be very good for tomorrow. Visit if you can.
Friday, December 05, 2008
The Politician and Family Life
Well, it wasn't the typical gang member, or the typical drive-by shooting, but something of an attack by Esteban Nunez, and his 3 friends, bringing out some knives and attacking some others after a party. They were all arraigned and entered "not guilty" pleas yesterday in San Diego.
http://www.latimes.com/news/local/politics/cal/la-me-nunez5-2008dec05,0,3458565.story
So now we have some parenting issues in the news, namely, how did things come to this? There is a lot that is leading to the conclusion that the son was not the clean-cut straight-arrow type, but was into anti-social and criminal conduct. A web page shows some non-flattering images of the defendant in his relaxed state. From Latino Politics blog http://latinopoliticsblog.com/?p=392 you can see what we are talking about.
Although not the hardcore gangster type, he and his friends wear the same tatoos and talk of hurting people casually as part of the routine topics for attention. The reports in the news were that Nunez said that his father would be able to get them to apply a self-defense claim to get off, which would show the the younger Nunez is already aware of what influence a politician has or thinks he has, from a son's view. Not a good picture.
The story is on talk radio and blogs so there's a lot coming out on this but parents of supposedly civilized levels of society still don't escape having children that wind up doing some of the most uncivilized behavior possible.
"Who is to blame for things coming to this?" is really the big question. That's the big question. I don't fault Fabian Nunez completely as others do, although his particular brand of politics is shady and he is a sleezemaster in my opinion. But for a man with numerous resources, financial and otherwise, you would think he would show his boy what is the difference between right and wrong.
Maybe therein lies the problem. Politicians really have their hands full when it comes to determining right from wrong in life since they usually don't pay much attention to that in their decisional making routines. "What pays off best" has a much higher standing in their personal priorities column, all part of their political makeup. Honesty, too, is one of the rarely considered qualities for personal conduct, so how would you expect much to rub off on their children?
Maybe this is not universal, since national political figures don't seem to have as many dramatic instances of anti-social actions. I feel a little bad for Nunez since I was defending the father's position in another blog against simple claims of bad parenting, and I didn't imagine then that the kid was as much of a "dark side" fellow as he is turning out to be with every new report.
I also wrote in that blog posting that the Mayor is "wise" to keep his mouth shut on a personal matter- and then Villaraigosa blows it by saying, "He's a great boy", as reported in that same blog. I thought the mayor was getting to be more thougthful in his choice for comments- maybe at least some tact in his personal friendships, and keeping them personal. But I was dead wrong and Tony is still the same foolish ego-driven deceiver of the public trust that he ever was, using any opportunity to get his name and face in the news. All of my "benefit of the doubt" that I allowed Fabian Nunez and Tony were undeserved, it appears, and maybe there should have been some more attention given by Mom and Dad to Esteban in growing up regarding who his friends were, and what were their activities that engaged their attention.
http://latinopoliticsblog.com/2008/12/04/mayor-villaraigosa-says-that-esteban-nunez-is-a-great-kid-a-good-boy-do-you-agree/#comments
You may have gathered that I am no fan of Villaraigosa, and you would be right. I hope he's a one-termer as mayor and a disasterous one, as well (see LA WEEKLY's "All About Me Mayor" http://www.laweekly.com/2008-09-11/news/the-all-about-me-mayor ) but we will cover that later.
For now, we all know or even have personal examples of ourselves, family and friends whose kids have a problem with life, drugs, the law, people or all of it. It is a tough question of who is to blame or what should have been done to come up with a better result. Think about it. I would like to hear what opinions are, even if they are different from mine. r.g. at lhs90031@earthlink.net
Thursday, December 04, 2008
December's Here: One Less Meeting, One More Parade
The December meeting of the Lincoln High Alumni Association was cancelled for the holidays by a membership vote on a motion at the last meeting (November). Hope to see you at the next meeting scheduled for January. Current membership dues are being accepted by mail, so check the Alumni Association link in the sidebar "Links to Visit" for that information or any other questions you may have on that topic.
The Lincoln Heights 2008 Christmas Parade will be coming to you this year on Sunday, December 14th, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. According to the Lincoln Heights Neighborhood Council's 2008 Parade announcement. The parade route proceeds mainly on North Broadway, coming from the DMV office at Lincoln Park Avenue and Mission- and then heads "West" on North Broadway to Ave. 24- (which is so typical of L.A., heading "West" on a street that is called "North Broadway," changing to "South Broadway" when it gets to downtown at First St. or Temple).
Mr. Mark Shapiro, Lincoln High's veteran and absolutely veritable teacher, is the stated parade announcer who will be working his vocal magic again, with that same affable style he's demonstrated for years as the announcer at Lincoln's home football games. You can find him and hear his mellifluous tones emanating from the Griffin Avenue and North Broadway judging area.
Wednesday, December 03, 2008
More on "Ask A Mexican," video style.
If you check closely, there are more clips to see at the bottom of the YouTube page, should you so desire. But not to worry, I might use them here, too, but in later entries.
Tuesday, December 02, 2008
LHS Professional Development Day Tuesday- "Do You Know Where Your Child Is?"
So any parents of a child at LHS be "in the know" and adjust your parental supervision radar to expect an early arrival home. If your son or daughter tells you that they were staying at the library, you might want to check that to see if it was the LHS school library, an undeniably beautiful place, but with so much potential use to spare. The L.A. Public Library in Lincoln Heights, Chinatown, Cypress Park, or El Sereno might be the library of choice here, open from Noon until 8:00 p.m. today.
What is "Professional Development" anyway? Good question. It might be many things to different people, but let me give a try to describing it. Conceptually, it's to make the current teachers better ones by providing instruction or activity to advance education or performance of the teacher. Sometimes it's just to get everybody on the same page, from a District standpoint. There could be new directives from the Beaudry headquarters that have to be explicitly pronounced so that a teacher can't say they didn't know. This could be something like reinforcing- or for some schools- introducing the policies against school bullying, harassment or other aspects of school life where teachers have been known to "drop the ball." Sometimes it covers health issues of various types or the teacher's career requirements that must be met, of which there always are more.
Another area that the "Professional Development" day includes is the planning within the particular school for anything, curriculum materials and approaches taken for teaching, departmental choices in what choices the LAUSD allows to be made. It's also an opportunity for training "on-site" without having teachers take school time off to go to training sessions, thus creating a vacuum that a substitute teacher is paid to fill, at the expense of interrupting any classroom routine or momentum. It also avoids having to do after-hours training for teachers to squeeze in. The "Professional Development Day" training could be considered as a consolidation of assorted trade-offs in the operation of a school program.
Effectively, the "Professional Development Day" is where 1-1/2 hours is open to fix, fill-in, enlighten, entertain, propagandize, mystify, demean or otherwise hold a captive audience of teachers on-site for things that have any arguable level of quality or utility. In my experience, some things of relative importance will wallow in a state of neglect, while there particular areas, "pet projects," if you will, that are given the spotlight.
But the opinions of this area are mine, and they do change with the specific focus of the contents for each of these days, since some items are good ideas but many just never really get to be applied, and others matters have the LAUSD quality of "dubious value" stamped all over them. And meanwhile, even though this might look at first glance to be a teacher's break from the students, they really aren't. Teachers still have to get back to make up any teaching such shortened days might have infringed upon. But that is just my view. Some teachers look at this as part of the scheduled day that's taken into account in lesson plans and pacing, and not as a loss of classroom time, or the "instructional minutes," that seem to be less and less over time.
Again, from the parent’s standpoint, your child or children will be home early- or let's just say, they will be "out" early. Where they will be is a separate matter. And from my observations at LHS, the school library is such a good resource that is so under-utilized, first due to "hours of operation" that did not extend much past 3 p.m., AND, second, because there is just a pervasive condition of inadequate English language skills, starting with reading itself. Most of LAUSD is pretty clearly in denial on this, not addressing the problem squarely.
Undeniably there are many students that do well and many excel. These are not the majority and these are not the students I discuss here. They will survive anyway, and that is why they also will excel. It's only the changes as to the degree of higher performance that their teachers will affect.
What I look at are the ones that DON'T have an ability to read up to grade level, and the ones who will someday get to the point where they just stop coming to school and become one of the many "Dropouts." Theses are the under-achievers and the ones that many teachers would prefer be put in someone else's class. The "problem students" or "trouble-makers" would not be the first or early picks if teachers could choose their students like two captains would choose up their softball teams on the playground. But then you don't want to make your job tougher by stacking the deck, or in this case, the classroom, with any problems if you can avoid it. It's human nature, or something of a self-preservation instinct that influences that attitude, I believe, leaving the "problem students" more firmly cast in that negative image they carry throughout the school career.
They are the "at risk" students, and the risk here is losing them altogether in the educational system. Many will be re-directed to or just accelerated on a path that includes low or no real job opportunities, criminal activity, dysfunctional family life and on and on. This is a consequence that happens from not getting even that level of education that LAUSD offers now. Of course it's a two-way street, and each student bears some responsibility for the results, but there are ways to guide and retain students in the system that improve the conditions instead of making "dropping out" the eventual outcome.
That eventuality is something that LAUSD cannot explain, but their highly touted, or should I say, highly self-touted, "A-G" curriculum that replaced all, or nearly all, of the on-campus vocational opportunities has something to do with it. The P.E. requirement reduction to 2 years out of the 4 years of high school also hurts both the students' performance and their health. Also affected by this minimal P.E. requirement but maybe not so obviously, is the school sports programs of today. The ones that still survive suffer from lack of involvement that the 4-year P.E. requirement created. Many students of old thought of going out for a sport instead of just taking the regular P.E. class that they would have to take anyway. There was more money, too, for handling sports programs, but the interest today is not as widespread as before, but the students who participate do so as intently as did any of their predecessors of days gone by. Everything that keeps a student in school and involved is something that should be viewed as a "positive" factor and should be enhanced, not reduced.
Until that realization happens, too many of your 9th graders entering Lincoln won't make the 4 years trip to their Graduation Day, regardless of how loudly LAUSD Board President Monica Garcia proclaims, "We will have a 100% graduation rate." Keep beating that drum, Ms. Garcia, and the only thing that you will do is lose your hearing, your vision apparently is already affected. There has not been ever an LAUSD 100% graduation rate, to my knowledge. Even during the Vietnam War era, when student deferments- based on being enrolled in school- were clung to tenaciously as a way to avoid being drafted, we still had a dropout problem.
First, maybe we should try for a 100% literacy rate- wouldn't that be something? And THAT change might lead to better graduation rates for LAUSD. Politicians are so full of themselves, and this is one instance of that, a truism, as far as I see it.
That all will be left as topics for another day here, just another regular development day on the blog, you might say.
Monday, December 01, 2008
What Questions Do You Have About "Mexicans"?
If you are a more observant reader of items appearing on this blog, you will see that I have been making some additions as we go along on this blogospheric path. I think knowledge of your culture is something good, as well as knowing of the culture of others, but sometimes it can be downright boring if done haphazardly, So, to handle both things, I have added a link in the sidebar, "Who Would Have Thought It," that takes you to "Ask A Mexican." Keep reading.
Over the past couple of years, I have read Gustavo Arrellano's column and have heard him on the radio talking about Mexicans. "What's so special about that?" you might ask, "People are always talking about Mexicans?" Not much special, at first, but it's the type of information and views about that ethnic group so near and dear to so many of us, and to others, or maybe just "so near,' you know, "the Mexicans." You might even be one yourself. "Who Me?" you ask now. Well, were you born here in the U.S.? Born down south? How about your parents, grandparents? Neither, but you are married to one, (or would be if he asked) or Maybe Prop. 8's involved here to keep you single for now? It's all "close enough" for most purposes. Just consider that it is, so now we can move on.
To get right down to the point, Arrellano's column is called, "Ask a Mexican," and he gives answers to the questions that may have lingered in your mind yourself but really didn't think much to find out more. To some he might be considered "threatening," as representing "them," that growing "minority group." To others, he might be viewed as spreading racist views in looking for the simple all-purpose answers to some complex questions about people (Mexicans). Read a little of his columns and you will get the idea.
I think he's got some interesting opinions with some actual information to base them on and most of the time it's either humorous or just plain funny, as well. And one other thing- he doesn't lump all Latinos as "Mexicans," which, no doubt most of you "Mexicans" know what I mean. "A Mexican hit my car," or "The Mexicans like those kinds of jobs," are convenient things to say when the truth is that it could be other Latinos, Salvadorenos, Guatemalans, even Cubans, and so on. "Mexicans" just carries the right "punch" and nothing else sounds right for that phrasing.
Nothing really substitutes for the word "Mexicans" when you're throwing out those epithets and accusations; try making the substitutions yourself. You may be technically accurate in such re-phrasing in identifying the ethnic group but it somehow does not roll off the tongue so smoothly and does not pack that crisp verbal impact that you get with "Mexicans."
O.K., enough "diversity" talk for now on this page. Read more, go to "Ask A Mexican's" columns in the "Who Would Have Thought It" sidebar links and consider that you didn't even have to study much to learn some things about culture. L.A. WEEKLY carries his column now, as does the original paper, the O.C. WEEKLY. And remember, just in case you are not clear on this session's discussion, this topic is within the "lighter side of life" things included in this blog.
