Showing posts with label ibew. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ibew. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 14, 2010

KCET's "DWP -The Price of Power" update program Thursday

An update is going to air on KCET this Thursday night on KCET- channel 28, the PBS local station in Los Angeles. It will also be made available online after it airs. You may recall that the original show was about the way the DWP operates.

In today's L.A. City Council meeting, Council Member Dennis Zine called the DWP "an agency that's out of control." Zine said that "we are going to get it under control," as I paraphrase that last part. Other CMs jumped on that bandwagon to support Zine, but they can and do get carried away with themselves from time to time, and then, sometimes nothing more ever happens. At other times, to make matters worse, they do a complete turnaround on the position and vote FOR a bad motion, one that energizes the city-agency-turned-Terminator and off DWP goes to further victimize the customers, called "rate-payers" by them, as if that's making the financial pain more bearable.

The KCET show is called, "SoCal Connected," and this DWP item was recently presented as a segment of the program, revealling a lot about the DWP and it's operations, featuring Brian D'Arcy, President of the IBEW local union that represents nearly 90% of the DWP employees. D'Arcy, a seemingly jovial character is nonetheless responsible for doing a lot of pressuring to get his way, and he does it effectively. It is as effective as the council's and mayor's resistance is lame.

==========================================================
I received an email about this upcoming show and here's the text of the attached press release:



‘SOCAL CONNECTED’ LOOKS INSIDE THE FIERCE FEUD OVER
RATE HIKES AT LADWP -- THE NATION’S LARGEST MUNICIPALLY OWNED UTILITY.


EPISODE AIRS THURSDAY, APRIL 15, 2010


KCET’s Award-Winning News Program as Part of Primetime Line-up that Includes ‘Washington Week’ and ‘Bill Moyers’ Journal’ on Fridays at 8:30 PM, Plus Saturdays at 6:00 PM, and Sundays at 6:30 PM

Los Angeles, CA – April 13, 2010 – SoCal Connected takes a deeper look at what’s behind the bitter battle over DWP rate hikes. In late March the Mayor called for a hefty increase in electric rates. The City Council – uncharacteristically – rejected the hike. The DWP, in turn, is refusing to pay the cash-strapped City millions in fees. Why, in the middle of one of the worst budget crises in Los Angeles history, is the DWP immune to layoffs, cutbacks and furlough days? Why are other city workers losing their jobs, while the DWP biggest union is enjoying a 5-year pay raise? Why do they get raises when they are already paid more than other City workers? This week SoCal Connected Anchor Val Zavala updates her investigation into the City’s most powerful department, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power.

In a rare TV interview, Zavala talks with Brian D’Arcy, the powerful head of the electrical workers union (IBEW Local 18 which represents 9 out of 10 DWP employees). D’Arcy defends the pay deal, saying the higher salaries paid to DWP workers are merely the price of attracting talent in a competitive job sector.

Confronted with the complaints of angry ratepayers, he responds that “...generally how they feel is not relevant.”

SoCal Connected also spoke with former Interim General Manager S. David Freeman who echoed D’Arcy, arguing that D’Arcy is just doing a good job for his members. But that may be cold comfort to customers, most of whom have seen their DWP bills go up significantly. SoCal Connected also talks with a former DWP Commissioner who predicts that some L.A. residents will see their utility bills exceed their monthly mortgage.

Find out what's driving up utility costs. How much will going green cost us? And who's in the driver's seat at the LADWP? “The Price of Power” airs this Thursday, April 15 at 8:00 p.m.

Next, SoCal Connected Correspondent Angie Crouch peers into the future of California rail transportation in “Track to the Future?” In 2008, California residents approved $10 billion in bonds to jump-start a long-discussed high-speed rail system connecting Anaheim with San Francisco and points in between. Last January, Congress granted $8 billion for the high-speed rail project as part of President Obama's push to develop infrastructure and create jobs. But critics argue that the real-world costs exceed the projected benefits and communities along the planned route wonder what price they’ll be made to pay in quality of life.

In addition to airing on SoCal Connected, “Track to the Future?” will appear as part of PBS’ Blueprint America, a yearlong multi-platform initiative examining infrastructure issues throughout America and the world. The series and its companion Web site (www.pbs.org/blueprintamerica) consist of content produced by national PBS shows, local stations and original documentaries distributed nationally on PBS. Major support for Blueprint America is provided by The Rockefeller Foundation and The Surdna Foundation.

Then SoCal Connected Commentator Marcos Villatoro tries to make sense of the alphabet soup that appears on his DWP bill.

“The Price of Power” is reported by Val Zavala and produced by Karen Foshay. “Track to the Future?” is reported by Angie Crouch and produced by Saul Gonzalez. The Executive Producer of SoCal Connected is Bret Marcus. Anchor is Val Zavala.

SoCal Connected, recent winner of six Emmys, eight Golden Mikes, including Best News Public Affairs Show, five LA Press Club awards for journalism, recipient of the Edward R. Murrow Award for Best News Documentary, and Los Angeles Magazine’s “Best New Local TV Program” of 2009, airs Thursdays (8:00 – 8:30 p.m.), Fridays (8:30 – 9:00 p.m.), Saturdays (6:00 – 6:30 p.m.), and Sundays (6:30 – 7:00 p.m.) exclusively on KCET. For more information, to view episodes online or to post comments, please visit www.kcet.org/socal.

SoCal Connected is made possible through the generous support of The Ahmanson Foundation, serving the Los Angeles community since 1952; Jim and Anne Rothenberg; Linda and Abbott Brown; The Elizabeth Hofert-Dailey Trust; The John Randolph Haynes & Dora Haynes Foundation; The City of Los Angeles Department of Cultural Affairs, UCLA and U.S. Bank.
===========================================================================

There are quite a few Lincoln grads among the DWP employees and this may or may not show things that are anything new to you. And don't get me wrong on this criticism of the operations. Good for you for having such a vigorously supportive union. It's their job and they seem to adopt a "take no prisoners" kind of attitude when it comes to negotiations.

But a lot of financial problems we have are the result of the generous way the mayor and council members have been to the DWP. The only real negotiating skills that were shown when contracts were assembled were on the side of the IBEW.

After deals are done, the Mayor can sign off as Villaraigosa did for the contract worked out while Hahn was still mayor. This was in 2005.

The Mayor never really opposed anything DWP presented, and he had his own expensive ideas to throw in. All this chumminess has resulted in 5 yearly raised created that CITY COUNCIL approved in December 2009, as the city was sliding down the hill, nearing the bankruptcy ledge. Does that make any sense? Does the term "rubber stamp" ring a bell? Make that "$178,000.00 per year Rubber-stamps." (Note: next election for even-numbered CDs is in March 2011.)

So we have a lot of expenses connected to DWP in their confusing and big billings that keep growing.

The Mayor seems to have forgotten that there are quite a few million people he is supposed to be WORKING FOR. I think that there was something of an oath of office that he took but those are mere technicalities to him, as usual. Meanwhile, the Mayor, the City Council and the political appointees have ALL, until recently, worked to make DWP life pretty cozy, but it's all at the "rate payers" expense, and who cares about them? No one, for a long time it's been like that.

A lot of waste and abuse going on unchecked- I am not real certain of the fraud part of this trilogy of financial frolicking with taxpayer money, but I am sure we can locate some.

So all this current opposition to the DWP by City Council is not permanent and I suspect some is phony. You had one CM leave a meeting to avoid having a vote show either way on the DWP rate hike request. It's politics, I remind you. Like magicians, these politicians practice their trade using the art of distraction and re-directing attention while the real deed is done.

So, see the t.v. show on Thursday. See if the KCET report come down on the DWP or if they start to get a little too cozy with them on their own and turn into another show like Patt Morrison's with softball questions that skirt the real issues and leaves us no better informed than before.

As always, there's so much more to talk about with what's going on that's not on the up and up, and most of that is not even secret, but most of the people don't notice or don't care. Time to change that.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Got to check RonKayeLA.com- a lot of City Hall drama; And the KCET vid link

Here is something, with a few edits, that I included in an email I sent out today to my closest friends - well, some might be. I just want to share the word in connection with the Glassell Park meeting on Saturday and even if you don't go, this could "inform, enlighten and entertain," all in all not a bad goal.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
A must for finding out news and views on the city side of politics is the RON KAYE L.A. blog - http://ronkayela.com/ for a source this week to show some lively happenings at the city council meeting Tuesday and Wednesday, with a slew of postings this week, all of which are very enlightening in the interactions of the Council and the DWP . There is just too much happening that's reported (with opinion, of course) to just focus on some. You really need to check through this according to your own interest and curiosity as to the working of City Hall politics.

The Comments to the blog's postings give some additional reactions and views.

IF A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS- WOULD VIDEOS BE SPEAKING VOLUMES?
There are some video clip excerpts from meetings this week to give you a sample of the conflicting messages being presented by all the players. This collection would be something of pure entertainment value but for the overall dire outlook it represents for the city.

That burden is expected to be borne very heavily by the residents and businesses that still remain in the city limits. More money to be extracted for less and poorer services is the bottom line. Among all this chaos, you will not find any sort "mea culpa" statements of contriteness directed to the constituents coming from this arena. On the contrary, "finger-pointing" is becoming the preferred method of explanation and disentanglement.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DWP


Here's a direct link below to the KCET program mentioned before that pulls the wraps off of Brian D'Arcy, IBEW local President running the DWP- actually he's just running the union over there.... on second thought .... well, maybe you could just check the segment below.

"DWP, High-Speed Rail, Marcos Villatoro"
first aired: 3-17-10 with Val Zavala
http://kcet.org/socal/2010/03/dwp-high-speed-rail-marcos-villatoro.html#comment-4648

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"SoCal Connected" - Past episodes page: http://kcet.org/socal/episodes/season2.html

Saturday-3-27-10, Open Meeting, Glassell Park- Garcetti at N.E.Central Alliance of NCs; KCET & DWP's Brian D'Arcy

Here's an email followup for a meeting of the "North East Central Alliance of Neighborhood Councils" ("NECA") this Saturday, March 27, 2010 at 10:30 am to 12:30 pm. It's free and open to attend. Eric Garcetti, Council President will speak- it's in his district, you know. Jack Humpreville a most informed public advocate on DWP matters will be there, as well as one of the commissioners, all of whom are appointed by Mayor Villaraigosa.

THE LOCATION:
For those not familiar with the meeting location, it's at at Intersection of Eagle Rock Blvd. and Verdugo (from south), and, the northbound 2 Fwy. (Glendale Fwy.) "Verdugo" off-ramp points you right at the building across Eagle Rock Blvd. (go straight across, veering slightly right to Verdugo's angled intersection there).

The Community Center entrance is at the rear of the Public Storage facility, accessible through the driveway (just N. of the Glassel Park swimming pool). That parking lot fills quickly. Street parking (no meters here but cramped) varies depending on interest in the event and the activities in the adjacent park and pool.

======================================================
THE EMAIL TEXT RECEIVED TODAY:

"From: Paul Michael Neuman
Subject: Inviting you to this Saturday's meeting of NECA (North East Central Alliance of Neighborhood Councils)
To: reneenahum@yahoo.com

Hello,

You are VERY welcome to join this Saturday's meeting of NECA -- the North East Central Alliance of Neighborhood Councils. Free to attend, it's Saturday, March 27 from 10:30am-12:30pm, at the Glassell Park Community Center, 3750 N. Verdugo, Los Angeles, CA 90065.

The special speakers are L.A. City Council President Eric Garcetti, Board of Neighborhood Commissioners Vice President Albert Abrams, and Jack Humphreville, president of the DWP Advocacy Committee. We'll hear about and discuss such crucial topics as the city's budget crisis, the status of DONE, and the controversial proposed "EFAC" rate hikes associated with DWP. There will be Q&A, of course.

NECA meetings are open to the officers and other board members of the many Neighborhood Councils in the Central and East areas, and to stakeholders and other guests from throughout the city. Alliances such as NECA are NOT governed by the Brown Act, in part because generally, alliances do not solicit or attract that level of representation from any one NC. But we always urge appropriate sensitivity, common sense and responsibility regarding such matters, in particular when any individual NC has many members present. Motions can be made as part of a NECA meeting, though none are presently scheduled for this Saturday.

An Alliance is a great way of building a shared voice and common purpose. NECA is NOT about conquering territory -- it's about developing relationships and helping each other in local and civic causes. In our brief history, we've enjoyed meetings that have been provocative, informative and hopefully transformative, but we've also sought to be supportive, or at least respectful, and not belittling toward each other and our guests. To this meeting, we're inviting current board members, but also newly elected ones who are not yet in office, and even some whose status may be in doubt: a later NECA meeting, but not this one, will be focused on ways to examine and improve NC elections.

I appreciate any interest you may have in NECA and this meeting; I apologize if you've received redundant invites; I hope you'll contact me with any questions or comments, and an RSVP is especially useful. Lastly, I know of at least one other fine NC-related meeting happening at roughly the same time, in a different part of the city -- that kind of conflict can happen despite the best of intentions. Our meeting is scheduled to start at 10:30 and end at 12:30 but might last a bit later, in part to accommodate some folks who may try to attend both meetings, but also because we expect some great discussion. Thanks again,

Paul Michael Neuman
(also, co-chair of Silver Lake NC)
pmneuman@yahoo.com "
================================================

DWP "arrangements" examined by KCET's TELEVISION "SoCal Connected-
Here's a fresh production from KCET that tells more of the dark side of things that help kick up your bills if you are a DWP customer, either as a business or as city residents:

Featuring DWP AND BRIAN D'ARCY, IBEW LOCAL PRES.
KCET "SO CAL CONNECTED" show- segment:"DWP- The Price of Power" Hosted by Val Zavala, (view online at
http://kcet.org/socal/2010/03/dwp-high-speed-rail-marcos-villatoro.html#comments ) It is a timely and illustrative production that is presented in the first part of this episode which just aired this week. The "High Speed Train" is the second big segment in this episode.

There are a lot of political shell games played at this level and you might be surprised seeing how DWP's pay scales so out of whack with that for the rest of city's employees. This is what you can see happens when you have "Union Clout" meet "inept contract negotiators," and that's a generous term, coupled with a "proprietary city agency" that has huge gaps as far as Council oversight (Note the case of David Nahai's full pay "consultant" contract that closed out last year after he resigned in October).

You might trade "inept" for "selling out" since the contracts really were not totally forced on the city, but accepted because it's all about votes. The unions typically are very disciplined and can get their members out to vote FOR or AGAINST somebody or some issue. But the expensive result for the CUSTOMERS (that would be the REGULAR city people) is a cushy situation in terms of salaries, benefits and conditions for IBEW at the DWP, where about 90% of the employees are IBEW members.

If you are or know a DWP worker and union member, you already know how good it is and that's due to its union leadership. See the KCET program and you can see that their president, Brian D'Arcy, is no way any sentimental guy but working only for his members, in fact, he's a pretty arrogant guy- portrayed in this program as being so in a subtle way. Our council members and world-travelling Mayor should work so effectively for us; they already have the arrogance when it comes to responding to constituents. And on that thought, as a theme of Mayor Villaraigosa's administration of city government, "We Can Dream."

Thursday, March 05, 2009

Steve Lopez: Mayor's win not a victory? and IBEW and the Mayor deal Measure B

Steve Lopez, L.A. Times columnist comments in this morning's edition on the poor showing of the Mayor, a surprise to both him and to the mayor, as well. There are a number of things that are pointed out in the column to show some interesting conclusions taken from the election on Tuesday, including the fact that over 9,000 voters in the city elections did not cast a vote for ANYONE for mayor. "Villaraigosa's win might not be a victory," Steve Lopez, March 4, 2009. http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-lopezweb-2009mar05,0,3425143.column?track=rss

According to the news reports in the Times, there are about 4,000 absentee ballots that remain to be counted. Measure B, to Solar Energy proposal that had no certain price tag established, lost by a few hundred votes, and this was needed by the Mayor to be able to take credit for it.

Measure B still has a chance of passing but if we are lucky, it will not. A proper ballot measure can and should be presented before something of such huge financial impact is considered. The measure still had lots of information on costs ranging between a million to 3 million dollars, and we weres supposed to trust them while giving, essentially what amounts to a "blank check" for the costs, and making this a change to the City Charter. This was not done that way, and simply done so because it was a product of deceit and backroom deals. The mayor's interview on this is very revealing on the topic.

Measure B's Smoking Gun: Antonio Confesses Measure B Is a Payoff to the IBEW
"You say, 'We cut a deal with them.' Yeah, we did. We built a partnership with them...they didn't see any jobs." -- Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa in an interview with the LA Business Journal published Monday March 2, 2009."
By Ron Kaye on March 2, 2009
http://ronkayela.com/2009/03/measure-bs-smoking-gun-antonio.html

Kaye starts of with, "That's what Charles Crumpley, the editor of the Business Journal, reports under the headline *Mayor and Business a Poor Union.* "

The IBEW involvement was genuinely responsible for adding in the DWP jobs training program and the provision to prohibit any others but the IBEW local from doing the installations. This was all what the mayor gave up in trying to get the union to give in on the Solar proposal. They had been against this for about 9 years according to other critics, and suddently "Measure B" pops up by the deadline to go on the ballot, and the union does a complete change in position, and is in full support now.

All these deals are too often the norm for political representatives, and they say something else- which is what fits the regular definition of a "lie." Not a complicated analysis at all.

But why the URGENCY to put in on March 3's ballot? (1.) so it can win in the traditionally low turnout election when most people are not aware of an election and even less aware of what it's for, and (2.) So Tony could add it as HIS baby, that HE got it passed in what he likes to say as a slogan, "L.A.'s the greenest large city in the country," taking the credit himself first and then tossing crumbs to a few others while he assembles a resume to run for Governor in 2010. At least that was the plan. He's gets the goods and we get the bills. He may be sticking around now for the entire term, but not by his choice.

Lopez gives his view of what Villaraigosa's actions mean and some opinion on what the Mayor could do.

Monday, March 02, 2009

“B” is for “BOONDOGGLE”- Local Elections Tomorrow

Definition: boondoggle (noun): "A wasteful or project or activity often involving graft."

That is sums up what Solar Measure B really is about.

Measure B is the most un-ready measure to be placed on a ballot for all the billions of dollars of expense that it will cost, but a main feature is the plan for DWP to be in charge of the solar energy program by changing the City Charter, the city's "consitution" that controls it's operation.

MEASURE B is far from the "free" energy picture that's being painted for you. There is no possibility for you to "sell' any excess power back ever, all belonging to the DWP, and the whole deal is not in your favor, at all.

If the DWP contract was a "sweetheart deal" for the union, this measure is their Christmas and Valentine's Day, all in one.

Remember that, "It's the way of the future" and other slogans just don't correctly address the cost issue- and even supporters of B can only "guess" at the real cost, and that's all going to be winding up on your growing bill.

All the facts to give us solid figures are not in or are still just expectations, not absolutes. Everything is in terms of estimates and not even very good ones. But the City Council put that risk on YOU, just to get it to the ballot by the deadline for THIS election when most voters don't come out. Tricks? Certainly. The Council is skilled in some things and getting things by you is their specialty.

Two items for examples:
IBEW union workers will love it because all others are made INELIGIBLE from doing the installations. Bidding is not permitted and all work will go only to the IBEW, who wrote many terms in the measure.

The job training program in the Measure will give IBEW new members in this closed setting, with the COSTS OF TRAINING the individuals to be paid by YOU, through the DWP pass-through of charges for all they do.

IBEW gets only gravy, AND Consumers the risk- some say they "get screwed- some more."

YOUR city agency should not make YOU respond to THEM- things are backwards. The PUBLIC is who is to be served BY the DWP. Do you hear that Mayor Tony? And David Nahai, attorney picked by Tony to carry out his plans needs to hear that too.

And still the workers should not be viewed as the bad guys, since they just do the work. But the Union leadership is like their lawyer, getting the best money and benefit terms for the members, and ONLY their side is the purpose. MAYOR TONY in 2007 gave some great contract pay and benefit terms, with some very big raises locked in, as his plan to get more union voters on his side.

With financial burdens getting to be more serious as job cutbacks are being made, and costs keep going up, Measure B has the potential for sinking people who are trying to stay afloat.


VOTE NO ON 'B' and don't worry about losing our chance for solar energy- the whole thing can be done again but with a FAIR and COMPLETE plan next time.

FOR NOW, the city politicians are purely tricking you, taking advantage of you, and lying to you for benefits that DON'T go to YOU.... but the BILLING sure will.