Showing posts with label L.A. Clean Sweep. Show all posts
Showing posts with label L.A. Clean Sweep. Show all posts

Sunday, March 06, 2011

L.A. Clean Sweep endorses in L.A. City Elections on Tuesday- your vote is important. In CD-14, elect Rudy Martinez

LA CLEAN SWEEP IN THE MAIL -AND ON CABLE TV IN FINAL DAYS.

Election Day is Tuesday. Just a very quick message for voters living in the city and in an even numbered district-

The local organization I support, actually a city-wide local group, is the L.A. Clean Sweep movement. It was formed to bring us responsible government to City Council and end the corruption that you can find in the news every week. All this costs the taxypayers who live and work in Los Angeles in the form of reduced services for increased costs, while deals happen to help "friends" and special interests but not much to better the conditions.

As we have seen Los Angeles conuncil persons act in a continued manner that creates no improvement while their management and that of the Mayor, Antonio Villaraigosa, heads us closer to a bankruptcy each day.

We want to sweep out the old and put in people who want to change the practices that have put us in this situation.

The candidates endorse by L.A. Clean Sweep reached after a detailed process including candidate interviews and finally a vote on the recommendations by the membership to produce this list.

Here is the complete LA Clean Sweep Candidate List:

District 2: No Endorsement

District 4: Stephen Box

District 6: Richard Goodman, David Barron, and Jamie Cordaro

District 8: Councilman Bernard Parks

District 10: Austin Dragon

District 12: Kelly Lord and Brad Smith

District 14: Rudy Martinez

================================


Rudy Martinez is challenging Jose Huizar in CD-14, a district that covers Eagle Rock, El Sereno, Boyle Heights and areas of Downtown.

I have followed the activities of city hall for a few years and the need for changes now is crucial if the city is going to change at all. We have seen examples of the city council use meeting after meeting to produce little action on its services and personnel. For approximately 9 months, they debated and maneuvered things to be more of an employment agency to put hundreds of people into the DWP, separately run (as you may have noticed from several news stories over the months).

The City created ERIPs early retirement that cut over 2400 people out of the general budget to lower the staffing. An entire accounting department was effectively stripped of its staff by the numbers taking the early retirement package. That was an expensive offering to entice retirement and the condition just mentioned was not seen until it was already done.

Another 300 people not paid from "general funds" used ERIP that did not help the budget since they were not paid from "general funds" but the expense only added to the costs of the program. As usual, lack of accountability runs rampant in city hall and needs to change.

This is just one example and there are many dozens more examples that show us that the highest paid council in the country ($15,000 per month salary) does not make for bettter performance.

You may have noticed that Council member Bernard Parks is an incumbent endorsed by L.A. Clean Sweep. Parks is probably the only one who has paid attention to the budget among all the CMs. He is not perfect but he does present the financial conditions to the council as it is, and many don't want to hear that. For month's they used to say "the 'B-word' in reference to "bankruptcy," very representative of the state of denial they pursued in the years since the budget crisis has worsened. Mr. Parks was often the bearer of bad news that was often not truly recognized by the other CMs.

============
IN CD-14
CM Jose Huizar has failed in his representation of CD-14. His ads say "He's a fighter." Really? He's not done much in his 5 plus years in City Council although he loves to claim credit for everything by attaching, "Jose Huizar Presents...." This past year was an all out effort to try to claim credit for anything as if it was money coming out of his own wallet. The real picture is that it comes from taxpayers in one way or another and much of what Jose claims credit for would have been done by anyone in the office as part of the job.

He does have favorites, putting around a milliong to "Bring Back Broadway" and working to put a street car in, a very expensive proposition but that's Jose. Being a friend of Mayor Villaraigosa and supported by many of the same supporters the Mayor should tell you a lot. CM Huizar was selected as the successor to CD-14's council member when the Mayor cut short his term to run for election as Mayor, even though he promised to serve out his full term as CM in CD-14.

There are very many CMs loyal to the Mayor and you do not hear any criticism from them of the many opportunities that have come where some better leadership did not happen.

In this campaign, the relationship that Huizar has with the Mayor is kept very quiet so as to keep peace with the Mayor and to avoid showing the tie with the failed Mayor, lest people see the link.

Rudy Martinze in CD-14 is the better choice. Putting most of the campaign money from his own pocket tells you he is not in any sense a "bought and paid for politician"-notice Huizar's funding comes from assorted factions and it's there with the expectation of "getting what they paid for," otherwise called "patronage politics."

Rudy Martinez has successful private sector business experience that you don't see among council members and this is what's been absent in the City Council for many years. Martinez should be able to bring a better perspective that could only improve what the City Council does. Huizar, like most in the current council, is a career politician, looking ot maximize his time in office and then move on to another. Maybe we can make that move happen sooner.

In CD-14, vote for Rudy Martinez. This will be a low-turnout election which means you can come out and have a bigger impact than you might have in the state-wide elections. Many people are registered and just don't bother to come out thinking everything is not going to change. Come out, make the changes happen. If you put the same people back for another four years, how can you expect that they will change their behavior after already working at least one full term?

Friday, September 24, 2010

City Council March election hopefuls at "L.A. Clean Sweep" public forum Saturday

SATURDAY AFTERNOON IN HIGHLAND PARK- for the public

The March 2011 city election nears, just a bit over five months away, and here is the first event featuring the candidates for the even-numbered City Council District seats. Well, even though the incumbents have been invited to attend, Bernard Parks of CD-8 is apparently the only one who feel secure enough to show up.

"Clean Sweep Presents LA's First All-City Council Candidate Forum from 1 to 4 p.m.. Details at: http://ronkayela.com/2010/09/clean-sweep-presents-las-first.html

This is a free event, with a registration requested to ensure the seating requirements can be met.

The location is the American Legion Hall at 227 N. Ave. 55, between Figueroa and Monte Vista.

This city election offers an opportunity to unseat several from their reign over the city where you see that honesty in government is a lost concept.

Some of the signs of that, if you are a non-believer or maybe simply a fan of these elected officials is that they had their voting machines set to generate an automatic "Yes" vote for motions, showing that really no one opposes another's motions or there's payback. "You vote for my motions or your motions will not pass," is an unspoken rule, and where there's no response to meaningful discussions or just no meaningful discussions to begin with, you have a dictatorial environment operating.

It's all very corrupt to say the least. Sometimes a "Yes" vote would be registered and the Council Member was NOT EVEN IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. (That had them scrambling for excuses when the L.A. Times revealed this set up.) I've heard Eric Garcetti ask for corrections from time to time on the vote as incorrectly registered and I suspect they still have not set the auto-pilot "Yes" vote control to "off."

The other thing that this automatic voting setup tells you is that there is really no need to read or study whatever comes before a CM. If they aren't interested in the particular topic- why should they read it? They are voting "Yes" anyway, right?

This seems to have happened with that ballot measure B on solar power- totally distorted by Garcetti and they all voted to put it on the ballot only to find a lot of manipulations and self-serving provisions (of course) inserted that would have you thing the IBEW local union itself
wrote it. Maybe they just dictated it. The CMs were changing their opinions when the public complained and it was Garcetti trying to find some way to avoid blame. Fortunately, Measure B was defeated at the polls by the people for the phony setup that it was.

There was a calculation of the votes taken in Council's motions that showed they voted UNANIMOUSLY in over 99% of the votes taken.

So when you see people in Public Comment speak against a motion in front of the Council and then see that the vote taken right after those comments is a unanimous "Yes," it looks like those speakers were totally ignored. And that's just what happens.

The speakers might have had more success in persuading the public out on the street by saying the comments out on Spring Street instead of inside the Council Chambers.

The other fact often presented is that while Public Comment goes on, the CMs have their own conversations with aides, chat with each other, or simply leave the room. It's so bad that often the person at the podium has to ask that they please pay attention to what they are saying.

There's lots more to show that tells you we need an overhaul in City Council, but if you are in the groups getting an inside connection and are having your interests addressed, then you have an interest in keeping that CM in office with so much invested in making campaign contributions and deals. Or maybe you are on the staff and in that case I can see why you would like to stay employed aside from the CMs worthiness or lack of same. That's just about job survival, not anything to do with a CMs actual merit.

More to be shown by candidates, for sure, before the elections, but at that $15,000 a month salary and perks on top of that, you know it's taking nearly a demolition team to get those incumbents out of their seats.

Too often we have acquiesced to the political double talk and allowed the career politicians to control major decisions that have taken us perilously close to a city bankruptcy filing.

Politicians at other levels are as bad, if not worse- check the State level and see that even Mayor Villaraigosa's cousin, State Assembly Speaker John Perez is caught clearly with more political-speak than substance in the news clips of the last few days, but it "sounds" important. Mostly it's all for the public to think something productive is happening with a state budget that's nearly permanently overdue.

It's time for change all around, but starting at the local level is a very do-able action to get better government.